IMF (Australia) Ltd  
About Us Funding News Shareholders Cases Publications
 
 
 
Ezishop
Date of Funding: 11 Jun 2003
Plaintiff: Ezishop.Net Ltd
Defendant: Veremu Pty Ltd & Ors
Court: Supreme Court of New South Wales
Cause of Action: IMF funded proceedings brought by the liquidators of Ezishop.Net Ltd (in liquidation) against a number of investors in the company.

Ezishop carried on business as a retailer of consumer goods via the internet and television infomercials. Its plans to undertake an initial public offering were severely affected by the so-called 'tech wreck' in April 2000. By August 2000 the company was in need of further capital.

In August 2000 various investors (most of them existing shareholders in the company) agreed to inject a further $2 million into the company, some by way of loans, but mostly by way of subscriptions for further shares. A Share Subscription Agreement was executed by the company and the investors. The Agreement provided for the subscriptions for further shares to be made in stages over a period of approximately eight months.

Shortly after the Agreement was executed, the company's fortunes took a turn for the worse, following which the company requested certain investors to accelerate their payments under the Agreement. When some investors declined to do so, the directors of the company had no alternative but to appoint administrators, and subsequently liquidators, to the company.

With the assistance of funding provided by IMF, the liquidators commenced proceedings against the investors, seeking to enforce payment of the subscriptions due under the Agreement was 'frustrated' and 'repudiated' by the company by reason of the appointment of the administrators/liquidators, and the inability of the administrators/liquidators to issue shares in accordance with the Agreement.
Result: The case was heard by Nicholas J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The trial lasted five days. On 18 March 2003 His Honour gave judgment in favour of the company. His Honour held that the administrators/liquidators of the company did have power to issue shares, and that the Agreement was neither frustrated nor repudiated. The decision has been reported: Ezishop.Net Ltd (In Liq) v Veremu Pty Ltd (2003) ACSR 199. The defendants' appeal from that decision was unanimously dismissed by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 10 November 2003: Veremu Pty Ltd v Ezishop.Net Ltd (In Liq) NSWCA 317.

The total amount of the judgement was approximately $1.7 million. As a result, the company's priority creditors (including employees) received payment of their debts in full, and the company's other unsecured creditors received a dividend of approximately 75 cents in the dollar. IMF received $1M on a direct outlay of $0.2M.

  Home | About IMF | Apply for Funding | News | Shareholder Information | Cases | Publications | Contact Us (©) 2009 IMF (Australia) Ltd | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer